Who's paying for Pre-K Campaign?

Reported by: Jaie Avila
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 9/13/2012 10:56 am
SAN ANTONIO -- Are you willing to pay a higher tax every time you buy something?

That is, if it goes toward providing Pre-K to San Antonio kids? That issue is on the November ballot, and a lot of money is being spent to sway your vote. News 4 WOAI Trouble Shooter Jaie Avila has the Inside Story on who's behind this campaign blitz.

You may have seen the signs going up all over town. Thousands of them have been ordered, along with TV ads and direct mail. They urge you to vote for the Pre-K sales tax increase.

Since the mayor and city council are behind this initiative, some of you asked us to find out if your tax money is being used to get it passed.

Mayor Julian Castro has pushed his Pre-K initiative at every opportunity, even during his speech at the Democratic National Convention. The city council voted to put it on the November ballot. The city's website features the message: Pre-K for SA, Invest in our kids.

However, city officials say tax-payer money and city resources are not being used on the huge advertising campaign that is just now taking off. It's being paid for by a political action committee, managed by Christian Archer, who is also Mayor Castro's campaign manager.

“There are no tax-dollars, no city dollars, going into the campaign. All that money is going to be privately raised and we're working on it now, in fact, we're more than half way to our budget”, Archer told us.

Archer says he expects to spend more than $600,000 on advertising between now and the election.

Where's that money coming from? The biggest employers in San Antonio: HEB, Rackspace, Nu Star Energy, Toyota, Valero and USAA have all written checks.

“I think people get it. This is an investment in the long-term health of our city. Employers want a smart, educated work force”, Archer said.

Opponents of the Pre-K tax hike say they don't question the importance of early childhood education. However, they think the city should leave that up to school districts.

They warn that city staffers are allowed to educate the public about the Pre-K initiative, but they can't cross the line and urge people to vote for it.

“If government is using its staff in an unfair advantage, that's the problem. Government should always be neutral in a matter until the voters decide”, said George Rodriguez of the South Texas Political Alliance.

On the signs paid for by private contributions, there's a key phrase: “Vote Yes on November 6". You won't find that line on the city website, because they're not allowed to tell you how you should vote.
Share
36 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

kflores08 - 9/13/2012 8:25 PM
5 Votes
I won't benefit from it because even though only my husband works we are not low income, we are not military and my children speak English. So I don't understand why I have to pay so someone else can benefit. True we kneed to support our community but taking money from one family to buy something for another seems unfair. When I worked, we sent my daughter to daycare at $110 a week because of the "requirements" for pre k. It is difficult but must be done because this is my child. It's like buying a car for myself so my sister can take it and drive it everyday. As for this will be the only opportunity for a child to learn that is a load of crap libraries are free. Take your child, get a card and read an age appropriate book everyday. Dollar tree has sight word, ABC, and number cards. Take the time to Contribute to your child. Can't afford daycare I'm sorry we are doing our best as a family to take care of our child I'm tired of supporting everyone else's.

Phrilly - 9/13/2012 7:45 PM
2 Votes
There wasn't any Pre-anything when I grew up. The parents taught their children what they needed BEFORE they went to school with no help from the city, county or government of any kind, but back then Mom stayed home and Dad supported the family. I, for one will vote no on this. We are being 1/8% to death. Notice it never changes back once it's on there? I guess you can charge it to the schools and put it on the school tax. Then if you are over 65, as we are, and you have filed for it at the tax office it won't affect you. I also can go to the military commissary so I can skip that one too. If you don't want it to pass you better get out and vote! Same goes for the Presidential election also on the November ballot.

esmiranda - 9/13/2012 2:44 PM
3 Votes
Not all parents use Pre-K for babysitting and not all parents can stay home from work and watch their children. Perhaps if parents can't afford their children then maybe they shouldn't have them but how can you tell someone they have no right to have them. It isn't your business. The system is so messed up. You have families on food stamps getting $600, $800 a month that cheat the system - and yeah it pisses me off. Children on programs with rotten teeth, parents sitting on their butts collecting food stamps, tanif, housing...makes me sick!! Anyways, My son went to Pre-K3 and Pre-K4. He is now in 4th grade and he has been an straight A student every single year and with perfect attendance. Pre-K can make a difference. It should not be abused.

usesomecents - 9/13/2012 1:12 PM
7 Votes
Children should be raised by their parents. If the parents can't afford to raise them, then they shouldn't have them. It's not up to the government to provide babysitting, which in effect is what pre-school for 4 year olds will turn out to be. Someplace where unfit parents can unload their kids for a few hours and let other people pay for it. Just another government handout if ya ask me, like the free breakfast and lunch programs in the summer. I've seen people run stop signs just to get to the schools in time for a free meal. None of the kids in the car were wearing seat belts either.

satoday - 9/13/2012 12:46 PM
10 Votes
NO NO NO - MAYBE JULIAN SHOULDN'T HAVE WASTED THE MONEY CHANGING THE NAME OF DURANGO STREET - IF HE WANTS THE PROJECT, HE SHOULD FIND ANOTHER FUND RAISING PROJECT THAT IS A VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTION - ENOUGH ALREADY WITH THE TAXES, TAXES TAXES ---

wisemanjro - 9/13/2012 12:42 PM
10 Votes
Nothing more than tax subsidized babysitting.

twister2 - 9/13/2012 12:30 PM
6 Votes
To HEB, USAA, Nu Star, Valero, and Rackspace and others favoring this program: thank you for wanting to invest in our kids and the future of SA.

Topaz - 9/13/2012 11:23 AM
9 Votes
For al of you saying "NO" Don't forget to get out there and actually VOTE!!! Your comments don't mean much if you don't back them up. If you don't vote, Castro wins.

scandals - 9/13/2012 10:35 AM
10 Votes
Did I actually read some goomba in here state think of the collective/community and not yourself?? Excuse me comrade but if people thought of themselves as in I NEED TO GET MY TAIL TO WORK we wouldn't be in this mess to begin with. I want no part of anything that rewards people for being lazy and penalizes people for having the will to work. I will be voting a big NO on this. I pray for the day when we get people in office that say we will help those in need get on their feet but we will not sponsor multi generational laziness so don't look to us the taxpayer to fund your BBQ/beer parties or pay your medical bills or rent anymore.

Mike K - 9/13/2012 9:21 AM
10 Votes
The federal government spends billions of dollars on Head Start annually. Every school district that services San Antonio has pre-K programs. Why the push to involve city government in an area that is already covered by two other layers of government? This proposal is just the big government, tax-and-spend, quasi-socialist Castro trying to expand the city's nanny-state governance into areas it wasn't designed to control. Castro, like every other quasi-socialist is power hungry and this just gives him more of it. All it is is a money grab by Castro and his buddies on Council. It's expected to raise $39 million annually and support 4,000 kids. Seriously??? It's going to take $10,000 per kid per school year for pre-school for services already provided by multiple other layers of government??? BTW...the annual cost for the average Head Stat student in Texas is almost 30% less than that. It's also a good point that the large companies supporting this would rather have the cost run through city government and sales taxes than the school districts and property taxes. Imagine how much a raise in property taxes on HEB's many properties or Rackspace's huge campus would affect those companies. Over the course of time it would cost them tens of millions of dollars. Of course they would rather push the cost solely onto us! We already have school districts and the federal government to do this. City government needs to stay out of education.
Current Conditions
74°
High: 93° | Low: 73°
Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.