Students being extorted with nude photos

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 10/19/2010 11:23 am
SAN ANTONIO -- We've all heard of "sexting," the sending of explicitly sexual messages or photos between mobile devices. But what can happen when those suggestive or even nude photos get into the wrong hands? You may find yourself or your teen a victim of "sextortion."

It's a new cyber crime that's becoming a real problem.

Jeanne's boyfriend always said the naked photos he took of her would stay private. That was true, right up until the day she broke up with him.

"He started threatening me with the nude photos," Jeanne. said. "He threatened to submit them to my company as well as post them on Facebook on the Internet and send them to all of my friends."

Scared, Jeanne actually went back to him for a short time. Just so the photos wouldn't get out.

"I was devastated," Jeanne said. "I was thinking that a million people could see my nude photos, and I had absolutely no control over it."

Internet privacy experts say while "sextortion" can happen to anyone, including adults like Jeanne, teens are especially vulnerable. And it's not always ex-boyfriends or disgruntled friends. Predators are using sexting as a weapon, too.

"When teens take and share sexual images, they don't want their parents their principal or the police to get a hold of them," said Parry Aftab, Internet privacy and security lawyer and Executive Director of WiredSafety.org. "So, that means when a predator wants them to do things, take more images or actually engage in sex, they say that they will make them public or send them to their parents to get them to comply."

Ross Ellis is the founder of the advocacy group "Love Our Children USA." She says, first, kids should be reminded that there can be legal consequences when it comes to sexting in general, including child pornography charges in some cases. She stresses that parents need to get involved to protect their children before it's too late.

"Parents need to not overreact," Ellis explained "They need to sit down with their teens and have a very important conversation. Nothing hysterical but, 'This is what can happen,
this is happening."

Experts also say if your child is a victim of sextortion, get authorities involved as soon as possible.

"What you need to do is make sure that your children come to you early enough that you can do something to help them," added Aftab.

Jeanne finally broke it off with her boyfriend. But as far as she knows, the pictures remain on his computer to this day.

"They're still out there," Jeanne said. "And there's absolutely nothing I can do about it."

Experts warn that teens who take or store nude photos of their underage girlfriend or boyfriend could be convicted of child pornography, even if they never send the pictures out. If convicted, they could go to jail and be listed as a registered sex offender.
Share
22 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

europdude - 10/20/2010 1:06 PM
0 Votes
Nothing new here, this is going on for decades ... via internet , phone, cell phone, webcam etc

eccc7 - 10/20/2010 12:38 PM
0 Votes
My daughter has had many boys send her pictures of their abs. Apparently they think they are The Situation - and that anyone cares. And if we are to believe the reports, even grown-up Brett Favre send pictures of his privates to a woman. Seriously. Who wants to see that?

eccc7 - 10/20/2010 11:17 AM
0 Votes
You are correct that the article wasn't about teen pregnancy, but if you read the early comments they are regarding the 'loose' girls and the the high teen pregnancy rates. The culture here in SA is such that the immediate response for any problem even remotely related to sex is to blame the girls. Especially on comment boards - always denigrate the girls but never say a word about the behavior of boys. I agree that nude pictures should not be taken by young people and have certainly taught my children that. My daughter is in high school and fortunately has never seen or heard of this type of thing happen. Hopefully that means it isn't as common as this article makes it seem. But they have also been taught that if something like that is ever sent to them as a joke or to embarrass someone else to never, ever forward it on. The only civil and polite thing to do is delete it and not share it with others. If you are passing it on you are just as guilty of harassement and bullying as the person who started it.

donoho - 10/20/2010 10:03 AM
1 Vote
@eccc7 - I agree with you entirely regarding boys' responsibility for teen pregnancy; however, this article was NOT about teen pregnancy, but about extortion (a crime) against stupid young girls and women, who allow nude or compromising pictures of themselves to be taken. Even more stupid, they often take the pictures themselves, and send them to friends or guys. They may in fact not be having intercourse. They're just stupid exhibitionists, who "forget" that any picture taken and sent can be resent to the world with the push of a button. If you don't want what you say or do printed in the paper, don't say or do it. My mother gave me that advice 60 years ago. It's still valid. I make no value judgement regarding their moral behavior...just the fact that they're STUPID TO THE BONE! And I bet the woman with the blackmailing ex-boyfriend would agree.

matilda - 10/20/2010 9:48 AM
0 Votes
Parents, school administrators, and prosecutors need to lighten up about nudity. Most people do not get upset about nudity. Why do we think otherwise? American media rarely shows simple nudity. In the past, of course, nudity was limited to National Geographic's display of "primitives", as not only was the nudity not Western, it was not even "civilized", thus depiction of it was allowed. The late 60's and 70's began to see the occasional displays of simple nudity. However, as the cultural conservatives organized, they targeted displays of nudity; and the FCC complies with fines for nudity on over-the-air TV signals. Even by FCC rules, nudity could be displayed late night, yet nudity is self-censored by the programmers. For example, on the Tonight show, Jay Leno held up a picture of nudists on bicycles. The private areas, even the buttocks, were pixilated. Cable TV, can display nudity and does, but always associated with sex or violence. And, boy, do both cable and over-the-air programmers display the sex and violence. Thus we get explicit scenes, say on Private Practice, of passionate sex and lots of bare skin -- but never (female) breast, buttock, or pubes under any circumstance. I suppose some people infer from this that simple nudity is more indecent than open sex or violence But what about the uproar over the accidental baring of one of Janet Jackson's breasts at the 2004 Superbowl? In the aftermath of that, the FCC chair, Michael Powell, reported to Congress that his agency had received a record number of complaints about "indecency" in 2003 -- more than 240,000 (for the year), up from 14,000 from the year before. However, a reporter from Mediaweek.com investigated the complaints: 99 percent of the complaints in 2003 and 2004 originated from the ultra-conservative Parents Television Council. So a small group of social right wingers has the nation fearing nudity. Lighten up and teach our youth to just say "so?" to the extortionists.

matilda - 10/20/2010 9:31 AM
0 Votes
If we weren't so hung up about nudity, such would be as disconcerting as similar threats regarding pictures of one in shorts or without headcovering. Most people are not that hung up about nudity, but they think most everyone else is. The media creates this idea by showing nudity only in a salacious or humiliating context, meanwhile broadcasting violence and sex, even on over-the-air stations, relentlessly. Simple nudity,if shown, is pixillated. It leads to the idea that being seen nude is worse than sexual display or open violence. Then, the FCC acts against nudity but not violence or sex. The FCC commissioners got all worked up about the Janet Jackson Super Bowl incident. But why? Although, in the aftermath of that, the FCC chair, Michael Powell, reported to Congress that his agency had received a record number of complaints about "indecency" in 2003 -- more than 240,000 (for the year), up from 14,000 from the year before, a reporter from Mediaweek.com investigated the complaints: 99.8 percent of the complaints in 2003 originated from the conservative Parents Television Council. In 2004, if the complaints regarding Ms. Jackson's bared breast aren't considered, 99.9 percent of the complaints were again generated by the PTC, and while the publicity over the Super Bowl incident generated some additional complaints, the media publicity and the PTC were undoubtedly behind most of those. Another reporter examined the 90 complaints that led to a 1.2 million dollar fine for an episode of Fox's Married by America. He found that all the complaints were generated by 23 people and that all but four of the complaints were identical. Only one person mentioned having seen the program. More than 5 million households had watched the "offending" episode. So, because of an overreaching and repressive federal agency, the media feels compelled to avoid nudity. Let's just lighten up about nudity. Teach kids to just say "so?" if threatened with extortion re nudity.

rodrma - 10/20/2010 7:32 AM
0 Votes
Serves them right. Hard lessons aren't easily forgotten. She probably won't do this again. As for the loser who did this, his time is coming. Karma usually is paid at a higher price.

cosmo511 - 10/19/2010 5:31 PM
2 Votes
Dont let people take naked pictures of you dumba$$

fscott - 10/19/2010 3:35 PM
1 Vote
eccc7 I agree with what you're saying, but if society wants to raise "Strong young women", then teach them not to give in so easily to a zit-faced looser.

eccc7 - 10/19/2010 3:08 PM
2 Votes
Shocking how even in 2010 all of the comments are about the girls being loose. Apparently here in San Antonio no one cares if their boys are preying on the girls or having sex early. Boys who are players should not be idolized, but taught to have respect for girls, treat them as equals and use a condom. Blaming the high pregnancy rates only on the girls perpetuates the 'macho' culture here. But this story was more about bullying than anything else - using a picture to threaten a person. I would say the person who threatens another person, enjoys embarassing someone else or bullies them is the one who needs to be disciplined and have some lessons on integrity.
Current Conditions
82°
High: 96° | Low: 73°
Partly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.