Private company may build San Antonio to Austin bullet train

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 8/16/2012 12:13 pm
SAN ANTONIO - If you wanted to drive between Houston and Dallas, it would take you a little more than four hours. The good news is you could soon make that trip in about 90 minutes.

The Texas Central High-Speed Railway plans to build a bullet train between Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston by 2020. The train will go 205 miles an hour and cost about $10-Billion to build.

The company plans to do it without seeking public financing.

“If we start taking the federal money, it takes twice as long, costs twice as much,” said Robert Eckels, the company’s president. “My guess is we’d end up pulling the plug on it.”

The Texas Tribune is reporting once the DFW-Houston line is up and running, the next phase would likely link San Antonio to Austin with a route parallel to the I-35 corridor. If that train goes just as fast, you could be to the capital in less than 30 minutes.

“We are not the traditional state-run railroad,” said Eckels. “This is designed to be a profitable high-speed rail system that will serve the people of these two great cities and in between and, ultimately, the whole state of Texas.”

Share
14 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

GoGo1971 - 8/17/2012 12:48 PM
1 Vote
I would rather have one going to Corpus Christi than Austin.

Phrilly - 8/17/2012 10:59 AM
0 Votes
I'm all for getting there quicker. However, the last time they were going to do a super corridor between S.A. and Austin they were going to need miles on each side of 35 to do it. This would include buying out a lot of homeowners. If they can do it without screwing the people on both sides of 35, great, if not, expect a fight. I'm not holding my breath that they will do it right privately or government supported. Mr. Eckels just what are the plans for the train. Now is the time to calm the masses.

romal - 8/17/2012 10:35 AM
0 Votes
This wuld be great for Texas, Butt. This could never happen, because, the greedy Poly wog's in office, they want a piece of all free Enterprize. Obama Care-Medical Co's, Insurance Co's, even AARP donated to Obozo campaign. Solendra and the Green mean machine- donated to Obozo campaign. It is allway's the Tax payer who takes the fall, for all scemes by the Poly wog's in power. Free Enterprize is not free, you have to spike the tip jar to play the game. It's riged (You have to pay to play).

shinerboy - 8/17/2012 10:28 AM
2 Votes
It'll be interesting to see if this actually works. A bullet train between Austin and Dallas yes. But from San Antonio to Austin? Not so sure. By the time you drive to the train station, check in, ride the train to austin (I'm figuring a 30-40 minute train ride), rent transportation to get to where you're going, you could have driven there. The only benefit is the gas savings and not having to deal with traffic. But with all of the monstrous vehicles you see in TX, that doesn't appear to be a motivating factor to your garden variety Texan.

catwalk0826 - 8/17/2012 8:49 AM
0 Votes
IN TEXAS!...This works in the North East states because so many people that live in the big cities commute to work and do not own a car. But in Texas we like to drive our cars. This is why you don't see a lot of car pooling being done.

210bro - 8/16/2012 9:06 PM
1 Vote
cool, route will be called the Birkenstock Express. Or the Grand Granola.

preexisting - 8/16/2012 8:40 PM
0 Votes
To YuBrandz: I;m not sure of the exact terms of the non-compete clause, but believe it precludes the State from allowing any type of competing transportation (which would include road and rail) within a certain distance from the existing toll road.

YumBrandz - 8/16/2012 7:37 PM
0 Votes
Doesn't the non-compete clause of SH 130 apply only to vehicles and highways, not trains & rail lines?

preexisting - 8/16/2012 4:22 PM
1 Vote
I'm in agreement with SA Native . . . the devil IS in the details. I'm all for private enterprise, and wish you luck with the endeavor. I am curious as to how you will get the right of way for a high-speed train (remember, that means the track MUST be closed . . . no street crossings and the track must be fenced off from the surrounding countryside) - will it be high-speed passenger only, or will your business model include high-speed freight as well? I applaud the private business aspect of this, but without more details about how the right of way will be acquired I must stop short of full-fledged support. The map posted with this story seems to show a right of way alongside the toll-road known as State Highway 130; if so, are you partnering with the State or will you pay the State for the right of way. If that's the case, then, how will you get around the non-compete clause of SH 130?

camidawg - 8/16/2012 2:50 PM
0 Votes
Dear Privy Train Builder: I really hope you read this. Here's what I have been saying for years. A person drives their vehicle to the train station, parks. High speeds to City X and upon arriving rents a cheap EZ-GO car (owned by you the company of course) for the day or however long they will be there. The profits go towards recouping the 10Billion cost of building the rail. After using it, they return the car to the station, boards to go back home and gets back in their own vehicle. It doesn't have to be outrageous cost to take these trains. The lower the price the more people will use it. This should have started 20 years ago and if I would have been a bazillionare I would have started it.
Current Conditions
75°
High: 88° | Low: 75°
Partly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.