Off-duty officer involved in crash warned about speeding in the past

Sgt. Gabe Trevino of the San Antonio Police Department (News 4 WOAI)
Sgt. Gabe Trevino of the San Antonio Police Department (News 4 WOAI)
Reported by: Janet Kwak
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 3/09/2010 12:03 pm
SAN ANTONIO -- An off-duty police sergeant who was involved in a fatal crash Sunday had been warned about his reckless driving before.

42-year-old Sgt. Gabe Trevino, a 21-year veteran with San Antonio Police Department was going home in an undercover patrol unit when he was trying to merge onto the highway on 1604 near Stone Oak Parkway.

Police say 64-year-old Rosita Davila, a mother of four, was driving westbound on the main thoroughfare when the two cars collided.

Davila died at the scene. Maria Elena Rodriguez, Davila's cousin who was also in the car, was taken to the hospital and said to be in stable condition Monday night.

According to the police report, an investigator on the scene believed the contributing factors in the crash may have been Sgt. Trevino's failure to yield right of way, and Davila's failure to use evasive driving.

Sgt. Trevino was not ticketed for a traffic violation, because police say there were no witnesses to prove he had broken traffic laws.

But police confirm that Sgt. Trevino had been ticketed for speeding a month ago, and has been warned about his reckless driving before.

News 4 WOAI went out to the scene of the accident with a driving expert, who points out there were no yield signs posted on the on-ramp portion of the highway, but says the drivers already on the highway always have the right of way.

"Regardless of whether there's a sign or not, common sense would tell us we've got fast moving traffic that has established lanes, versus a merger condition," explained driving instructor Gilbert Canamar of A-Approved Defense Driving. "So the established lane, which is the main thoroughfare, would always have the right of way."
Share
68 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

sarahsalas1 - 5/9/2011 9:09 PM
Reckless driving,Failure to stop at a stop sign,Failure to obey a traffic control device and Unsafe or defective vehicle are the common reason of accidents. these drivers should be reported we must report them online on www.driver-ratings.com

segovia - 8/25/2010 10:36 AM
Is this the best they can do; say that "she failed to properly take evasive action"???? He should at the very least, be kicked off the police force

Lampoon - 3/20/2010 6:46 PM
Im sorry Gabe's bad Kharma caught up with him and even sorrier someone else had to pay for his error.

TXgigi - 3/14/2010 11:00 AM
First, why is this story buried so deep that one has to do a search for the officer to find it? The story is still on the front page of other local news websites. Second, I drove this stretch of 1604 yesterday. There is no "merge" lane when entering 1604. If the officer was distracted in any way, I can see where he was at fault. One woman is dead. This accident needs to be investigated as if he was not SAPD. I've lived in Dallas and Austin. I've never seen police misconduct like I've seen in San Antonio. It's a disgrace.

rapzzzz - 3/11/2010 12:05 AM
sachris10- my point exactly.. two sides to every story. You were not there. I was not there. The other readers were not there. Nor was the media. The explanation offered is questions we should ask ourselves before passing judgement. We are "assumming" the officer is at fault based on the media coverage? Last time I checked each media station reported different "facts". This was an accident. Whether one party was at fault or both. It was an accident. When was the last time you were crucified for making a mistake? My heart goes out to this officer and his family.

sachris10 - 3/10/2010 3:28 AM
rapzzzz.. what in the world are you talking about. you Contradict yourself saying "WE WERE NOT THERE!!!!! but you offer an explanation for the poor officer. what a crock. The only information that we have to go by is what the media has put out and it does point to the fault of the the officer...

rapzzzz - 3/10/2010 2:23 AM
I strongly feel that SAPD will handle this case appropriately. As in any case, there are two sides to the story. I know everyone has been a passenger in a car at some point in time. With that being said - as a passenger are you 100% in tune to what the driver is doing at all times? Even if there is a witness to this accident- she was a "passenger". A passenger of the deceased. She's going to defend her love one. Wouldn't you? Do we honestly think she is going to tell the family that it was there mom's fault? Does she know how fast they were going? Is she 100% sure what lane the car was in at the time of the accident? Is she for certain they were not changing lanes? The family states the passenger blacked out. I do know that trauma/stress can do a number on ones mind/brain. If the driver of the jeep was in the left lane as indicated by the media - how do we know she was not changing lanes to the right hand lane as Sgt. Trevino was merging and collided with his vehicle? He would have truely had the right of way if his lane he was merging into was clear? Questions of why was Sgt.Trevino not tested for alcohol? Do you know for a fact that he wasn't or is this an assumption? what about the deceased? Was she tested for alcohol? or drugs? She was out having dinner/movies (perhaps wine with dinner?) There are comments about Sgt. driving record- perhaps consider the number of hrs he spends on the road (after 21 yrs)everyday protecting and serving the citizens of this city. Does this give him more experience? Yes! but it also increases the chance of error than the average driver. I am sure there are people out there who will beat his driving record by far. Not to mention the number of accidents. All the SAPD bashing - I hope the next time you need an officer - he takes the scenic route to your rescue! THIS WAS AN ACCIDENT. No matter what Sgt Trevino say and no matter what the passenger states.. WE WERE NOT THERE!!!!!

rapzzzz - 3/10/2010 1:37 AM
interesting

munster4x4 - 3/10/2010 12:24 AM
This was a horrible accident indeed, however, I have seen on numerous occasions when SAPD officers speed in unmarked cars and even marked cars. I've also seen on numerous occasions where an Officer of the "law" has turned on his lights to go through a traffic light just to get on the other side and turn them off just so he does not have to sit and wait for the light to change. So it is no surprise to me that even though this officer has had a prior ticket for speeding. It is also no surprise that he did not receive a ticket for this offense. It is clear that he did not yeild the right of way to Freeway traffic. I feel sorry for this ladies family. SAPD I see a law suit in your future.

sarahlvsrj - 3/9/2010 10:24 PM
It is called an accident for a reason. People should remember that this could happen to them too and judge less harshly. Who that has posted a comment on this blog has never received a traffic citation. It is sad that people point fingers before looking more closely at themselves.
Current Conditions
45°
High: 48° | Low: 42°
Haze
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.