Flood Warning expires at 5:58 PM on 5/29, issued at 5:26 PM Ecleto, TX | Falls City, TX | Gillett, TX | Hobson, TX

Battle over millions spent to improve Hays Street Bridge

Reported by: Emily Baucum
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 2/15 6:32 pm
SAN ANTONIO – A battle is still brewing over Hays Street Bridge, months after the city of San Antonio agreed to sell the land to a brewery.

Now, News 4 is learning the federal government may want millions of dollars back that have already been spent on bicycle and pedestrian improvements.

Several years ago, neighbors on the east side started a campaign to save the bridge and raised enough money to qualify for a $2.9 million dollar federal grant.

That’s the money now caught in the crossfire.

In the summer of 2010, the city of San Antonio held a ribbon-cutting for the new-and-improved Hays Street Bridge, calling it a gateway connecting the east side and downtown for bicyclists and pedestrians.

The improvements were paid for mostly by federal money.

"We get a very small portion of overall spending yet there's over a quarter of a million bicycle riders in the city,” John Yoggerst with the Bicycle Mobility Advisory Committee says.

That committee is part of the Metropolitan Planning Organization, a group that helps coordinate how tax dollars are spent to improve transportation in our area.

"We can't afford to give up what we've got,” Yoggerst says.

But sources tell News 4 the federal government wants that tax money back, all because the Alamo Brewery plans to put tables and chairs for customers on the bridge.

"The problem is the tables and chairs take up most of the lane – the main thoroughfare on the bridge – so bicycles can't go both directions and they certainly can't share it with pedestrians,” Yoggerst says. “There isn't enough room to accommodate everything."

TxDOT confirms the Federal Highway Administration sent a letter to the city saying it cannot back a project that benefits a private development and changes the way millions of dollars were spent to fix up the bridge.

Yoggerst and other sources say the federal government has told the city to give the money back.

"I think they've misused funds,” he says. "It actually defeats the purpose of trying to get money and having the city decide they have a better idea how to use that money, even though they said they'd do this with it."

The city and TxDOT both tell News 4 they are working together to figure out the next step.

The city says it’s given the federal government the current plans for the bridge – one that includes tables – and is working to find a solution.
Share
6 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

charlie50 - 2/17/2013 9:58 AM
0 Votes
A gate way to the east side "Are you Chitting me" this small neighborhood rd is nothing more than a gateway to more crime in this area .A bicycle and pedestrian path ...Right ,More like wellcome to the El cuchillo Party hope you brought your wallet. then cupple that with a beer parlor Great Idea.

Ridonkulous - 2/16/2013 1:33 PM
0 Votes
Downtown is turning into the new Stone oak. They screwed up and didn't wait until the funds were spent then put up the first class tables and chairs.

jefsr - 2/16/2013 10:26 AM
1 Vote
Ms Bauum;.......A group of citizens including two whistleblowers banned from city hall contacted you via email. We wish to talk to you/WOAI about the government represetatives investigating the misuse of funds by the City so that we can meet with them concerning the other theft and misuse of funds the City is hiding.....thank you............http://tpr.org/post/banned-city-hall.............http://blogs.sacurrent.com/index.php/texas-civil-rights-project-sues-city-of-san-antonio-for-banning-citizen-from-city-hall/

TXHomebrew13 - 2/16/2013 10:20 AM
1 Vote
And what would the concerned parties say to a compromise, like a supermarket that has the brewery sharing the same space around the bridge? Perhaps a compromise is not what any of the parties want, a "my way or the highway" stance? Has anyone asked HEB if locating there would be economically feasible for a small footrpint grocery store? Asked the Brewer if he would like to share the customer traffic with a grocery store? Sounds like a win-win to me. And then when the Texas Legislature updates our ancient TABC laws the brewer could even sell his elixir at the same HEB while serving a pint a.la. Starbucks (open the taps dot org). Cheers!

joepublic - 2/15/2013 6:23 PM
3 Votes
another socialist /corporate welfare project masked as capitalism. if a company is private there is no need to go asking the city for funding or abatements. taking public lands or property for the benefit of the private business at no cost to them. i guess that is the way they do things in desert southwest. if that is the case where do i sign up. yesterday a million for a grocery market. what is this? the market determines the need and someone fills it. i wonder who will get the million $ grant? wink wink.

cgunadi - 2/15/2013 6:18 PM
0 Votes
Are you serious? The City didn't agree to sell the bridge to a brewery, they're selling land next to the bridge. Talk about sloppy reporting!
Current Conditions
73°
High: 91° | Low: 68°
Mostly Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.