Animal shelter operator accused of hoarding

Reported by: Darlene Dorsey
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 9/30/2011 8:46 pm
SAN ANTONIO--- Former employees and volunteers say Cheryl Wildenstein, who runs Animal Friends Humane Society, is cruel to animals. The former workers joined the owner of the shelter property in court to ask a judge to grant an eviction notice to Wildenstein.

The former employees say Wildenstein keeps dogs locked in cages too many hours each day. In court documents, they also claim the shelter operator didn't keep necessary medical records or get routine vaccinations for cats and dogs--which has led to many illnesses. The workers says this makes it hard to find adoptive homes for the animals.
 
The former employees believe Wildenstein is a hoarder. They says she keeps too many animals on the property, has made many excuses for not granting adoptions, and has kept dead cats in a freezer. According to court documents, the shelter manager didn't allow pets with identification to be returned to their owners unless those owners were persistent or asked police for help.

One former worker, Lissa Tuttle, says she and others have used their time to bury animals and their own money to buy medicine. Alice Lang, who adopted a dog from Animal Friends, says she started volunteering after her adoption. She says she then discovered horrible conditions for animals. She told us the shelter operator wouldn't allow people to check the back of the property, where many dogs remained locked in cages, and said only few animals were kept up front for visitors to see. Lang says she left after six months of work.

Some neighbors have signed a petition. They want Wildenstein to go because they believe she is abusing animals and because foul odors from animal urine and feces fill the air. A former worker told us sometimes the shelter operator would leave feces on the floor for hours as she worked around it.

The property owner, Laura Alderman, is hoping a judge will grant her permission to evict Cheryl Wildenstein. However, Alderman says the judge had delayed making a decision on the issue.

The shelter is a no-kill facility but former workers say animals are dying from a lack of proper care. The shelter's website is asking for help to find homes for animals and help with relocating the shelter operation.
Share
18 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

1fostermom - 10/4/2011 3:48 PM
1 Vote
Lisa Tuttle is absolutely bold face lying. Why has she not mentioned that HER own dog was even buried out at Animal Friends. And yes, why wait years to come out with all these accusations???? Could it be that she now works for Animal Defense league who wants to take over this facility?

Cc899 - 10/3/2011 8:34 PM
1 Vote
Alright this whole "animals in freezer" thing had been blown out of proportion. Its not at the extent that you all are making it seem. When ( and very seldom) an animal passes, what do you want them to do? Paws in heaven is located in canyon lake, TX. Its not like they can make it over in a day. The animal is placed in there until they can rest peacefully. Its not a hoarding issue. For God's sake you people take one small thing and run with it without thinking. I'm sorry, but all this is insane. Its amazing how people can still feel good about what they are doing when every word out of their mouths is a lie. Like the person below said, bexar county deputies even stop by just for fun and to see their favorite dogs.

loyalvolenteer - 10/3/2011 8:22 PM
2 Votes
WOW! You people are nuts. Witchcraft? Seriously? I have volenteered at AF for over two years, and i have never seen an ounce of niglect. You people dont know how hard it is to run an animal shelter, and we do a GREAT job. And yes it is expensive to have someone to come in to take care of the decesed (not many at ALL), but you want to know why they do it? Because they CARE about the animals. These animals do not sit in the freazer for long periods of time. Also, the reason they are a little picky on adoptions.... They CARE about the animals and do not want to accidentally give them to the wrong family and that animal ends up on the street again. So back off. Im sorry, but there is nothing bad about this shelter. They have authorities come in just to show their new partner some of their favorite dogs. They know some of the dogs names by heart. Authorities have found nothing wrong and they have seen the so called "sacred areas" and so have I and there is nothing wrong. Leave the proffesionals to do their jobs!!!

hype28 - 10/3/2011 5:30 PM
0 Votes
Also, regarding animals in freezers, yes there is a reputable cremation service available. However, organizations need to have funds to pay them for their services - keeping animals in freezers indefinitely claiming intent to cremate them does not count. It is just further evidence of hoarding that the manager won't let go of them even after they have died.

hype28 - 10/3/2011 5:27 PM
0 Votes
Do a public records request - there have been many complaints and reports over the past five years regarding violations, and no thorough investigation has been done: deputies have not had a search warrant and were not allowed to see the entire property or all of the animals. Thanks to this eviction, there is now evidence needed to find out why local law enforcement has failed to act in the best interest of the public or these animals. You have it backwards: the news did not care until the land owner was informed on the situation. When she was unable to get AF to clean up their act and lower their numbers, due to her concern for these animals she reached out to the media until someone would listen. In the process, past volunteers reached out to help. It will be a long struggle to restore this property so it can be used by a reputable rescue organization as intended, to take in and ADOPT OUT animals and contribute to a No Kill San Antonio. AF cannot afford to pay rent. They already do not have funds to pay for routine vet care for the animals they have, a fact documented in their financial reports if you are able to find them. They should not be allowed to relocate these animals, but should accept the help of rescue agencies that have come forward and offered to take these animals in.

Cc899 - 10/3/2011 5:04 PM
1 Vote
Alright so if AF's conditions are so "horrid" then why wouldn't you have come forward 10 years ago? If these allegations were true then its not like you people would sit there and let it happen. The allegations you are making are uninformed and complete lies. Th only reason you are making up these lies is because of the news story. If there never was a news story then none of these lies would be said. Before kens5 and woai reported these lies, everything was fine, and normal at AF. THERE IS NO ABUSE, NEGLECT, or HOARDING. What don't you get???!!! The things you say are obviously lies because if they were true then you would have 'come forward' a long time ago. The shelter has been open for 10 years and just now people are starting these horrible lies just because of jealousy. I hope you realize the things you are saying are outrageous and make you sound arrogant. AF is a safe haven from abuse and neglect, NOT a source of it. I don't know how to make it any clearer... the truth will always be the truth. You can go ahead and call Cheryl whatever you want, and make up all the crazy things you want, and listen to these news stories and other lies all you want, just know that it will come back at you.

julers1 - 10/3/2011 12:09 PM
0 Votes
Cheryl Wildenstein should be charged with animal cruelty and abuse and not allowed to own animals again. If the judge just evicts her, she will simply move, regroup, and set up shop somewhere else, becoming another county's problem, and continuing her hoarding and abuse. She will do this again and again until a judge and court somewhere, stops her. If you want a glimpse into Wildenstein's future behavior, simply google "Kimi Peck".

Robert B - 10/2/2011 8:22 AM
0 Votes
I do not live in your area, but we had a similar story in our area. Former employees and volunteers wanted to bring to the public's attention concerns with a local animal organization. I say, if there is no wrong doing and there is nothing to hide, then let the organization be inspected from top to bottom to cast away any doubt that every animal is kept in the best possible care. This is the article from my area. http://www.wbir.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=177923

Cc899 - 10/2/2011 7:34 AM
0 Votes
If you don't believe me then look it up. Its unbelievable that you think I would make something like that up. Get your facts straight before you assume and believe other people's lies.

Cc899 - 10/2/2011 7:34 AM
0 Votes
If you don't believe me then look it up. Its unbelievable that you think I would make something like that up. Get your facts straight before you assume and believe other people's lies.
Current Conditions
74°
High: 97° | Low: 74°
Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.