City working with local contractors to check safety of retaining walls

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 4/13/2010 6:32 am
SAN ANTONIO - More than 230 retaining walls were built in San Antonio without permits.

The News 4 WOAI Trouble Shooters got a hold of the planning and development’s master list that shows retaining walls built near apartment complexes, in neighborhoods, and even near schools were originally built without permits.

While that may sound a little scary, San Antonio’s Planning and Development Director, Rod Sanchez, told us this means local developers are now coming forward, applying for permits and proving their walls are safe.

"When the wall collapsed at Rivermist, I think everyone was a little bit nervous. And sure, they started looking at the walls in their neighborhoods, wondering if there were permits pulled and if they were designed by engineers.”

News 4 WOAI was the first to tell you that the developer for the Hills at Rivermist, Centex, built this wall without a permit. Since the collapse, the city has been working with local developers to make things right.

"We reached out to the builders,” Sanchez said. “We asked for their cooperation to pull permits for the walls they've built over the last three years. And we got it. So, I think we've done a lot to restore the public's confidence in those walls."

This document the Trouble Shooters got a hold of lists the developers who recently applied for permits and the location of their retaining walls.

We spoke with Gary Joeris. His company applied for seven permits, including one for Pease Middle School off Hunt Lane and Potranco on the West side.

"We had all the information on hand anyhow. So we thought it would be better to just get it in and be more proactive," Joeris explained.

Joeris General Contractors has never had any issues with their retaining walls. But they quickly applied for their permits to prove their walls are being built correctly and they're safe.

We showed Pete Velletri what we uncovered. His grandson is a 6th grader at Pease Middle School.

"Makes me feel much more at peace," Velletri admitted. “It makes me feel good to know that the city is going to monitor the building of the retaining walls and the contractors are doing their part."

250 applications were filed with the city for retaining wall permits.  The permits will not be issued until all documents submitted to the Planning and Development Department are reviewed.
Share
7 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

FordMan358 - 4/13/2010 4:09 PM
So they get the permits after the fact - that only means the designs were acceptable. There's no way to verify that those existing walls were actually built to the design specs!

capcwfa - 4/13/2010 11:58 AM
Skoal;.....There is a mmuch larger criminal scandal that hasn't been exposed. We have been making reports to city/state/federal officials for the past 5 years concerning decades of fraud and theft concerning public and grant funds totaling in the tens of millions of dollars. Thursday we have a meeting with HUD OIG Special Agents to follow up on prior meetings. DA Reed has covered up the crimes for her former second in command- now city attorney Bernard. Police reports are ripped up by SAPD Chief McAnus ( who works for Sculley), proof of the crimes are confiscated from city council members, council is directed not to investigate reports of crimes and a criminal trespass warning is issued barring entry into city hall/council meetings. Chief Information Officer Richard Varn with the coaching of corrupt city attorney Deborah Klein (who both work for Sculley) provided the critical lies to the court to hide the decades of fraud at our city’s IT department. When deposed in 2007 he stated that he didn’t even recognize the term variable billing account and admitted that if there was such a billing account he knew nothing about it BUT in 2009 with the coaching of city attorney Klein falsely stated that ion 2005 he investigated the variable, found it legal, found that it did not violate any laws/rules, called Wash DC and found no grant fraud, that grant funds could pay for anything legal including a picnic, etc. He lied and other city employees lied along with him. (See Flickr posting of deposition and courtroom testimony)….. http://www.flickr.com/photos/18400551@N04/..... http://www.ripoffreport.com/government-services/city-of-san-antonio/city-of-san-antonio-cover-up-392c5.htm..... http://www.ripoffreport.com/government-services/city-of-san-antonio/city-of-san-antonio-tx-san-ant-cf8z5.htm..... http://www.ripoffreport.com/government-services/city-of-san-antonio/city-of-san-antonio-texas-mor-y2fa7.htm.....

lenny66 - 4/13/2010 9:51 AM
Are these the same contractors that built that POS wall in the first place??? Probably so. What a crock.

skoal - 4/13/2010 7:22 AM
In reading the posted comments the readers get it! Why doesn't the city of SA get it? I think WOAI needs to go back and find out from the City Manager- WHY NOW! The plans for development were filed so why is the city just realizing this? Asleep on the job maybe? Were any of the inspectors involved in the ongoing bribery scandal involved? What else has the city overlooked that will put the citizens of San Antonio in harms way? Seems there are alot of things happening on Sculley's watch as the City Manager, the taxpayer funded retirement party, bribery scandal, Gabe Trevino scandal, now this! Ms. Sculley you have a call on line 1, Phoenix is calling you, SA doesn't want you anymore!

upyours808 - 4/13/2010 6:26 AM
should not all contractors get the permits first, BEFORE even starting a project? Oh i'm sorry, they do things a@#backwards here!! Reading, only Now, these contractors and getting the permits to build anything here so people don't start SUING them. So backwards. Then sue the damm city for allowing these contractors to build in the first place without a permit and let alone insurance on their companies. I forgot this is San Antonio, Mexico and not San Antonio Texas. Idiots! Idiots! that work for this city. Corrupt, ass backwards idiots.

jackc144 - 4/13/2010 5:53 AM
My question is "were they required to get the permit and did'nt"? If they were required to and did not then they broke the law and should be Fined and did the City Inspectors overlook the lack of Permits when the plans were approved. They dshould be Fired. Doing the permits now is "Cover-Up"!!!

fatfreddy - 4/13/2010 5:09 AM
Sorry, this makes me feel neither warm or fuzzy. The only reason developers are 'reaching out' is that they got caught and are trying to avoid massive fines. Graft and corruption pervade this industry and not only in San Antonio. Supervision and enforcement of laws when violations occur need to be mandatory.

58°
High: 62° | Low: 42°
Cloudy
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.