Download: RSS | Email Alerts | SMS Alerts | Podcasts | Mobile
Hot Topics H1N1Spot CrimeHigh-water rescueFood 4 SAMovie Guide
Right Now: 55° Mostly Cloudy

Child Support Injustice Exposed

Reported by: Brian Collister
Email: BrianCollister@woaitv.com
Last Update: 5/15/2008 9:40 am
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Man ordered by state to pay child support for child who is not his. (Newport Television LLC)
Man ordered by state to pay child support for child who is not his. (Newport Television LLC)

News 4 has discovered there are men in Texas who are told by the state to pay thousands of dollars in child support, but they are not the father of the children.  News 4 Trouble Shooter Brian Collister revealed the state knows it, but is making them pay up any way.

Send your lawmakers your opinion on this law...

Rey Valdez was in the middle of a divorce years ago when his first wife told him she was pregnant.  He wound up paying $300 a month in child support for his young son, but when the boy was a teenager, Valdez got an anonymous call.

"I got a phone call, and I was told that, 'You need to look at who really is father of [the child] because you are not,' and that angered me.  I mean, how dare they?"

Confused and concerned after the call, he bought a DNA test.  The results showed Valdez was not the boy's father.

"It wasn't right," said Valdez, "I just couldn't believe something like this could happen."

He went back to court and the judge ordered the Attorney General's Child Support office to do a DNA test.  That office got the same result, that Valdez is not the biological father.

Despite those results, the judge ordered Valdez to keep paying child support.  So far, he estimates he's shelled out about $18,000 to his ex-wife for the boy.  

Valdez said, "It's money that could go to my children, my wife, myself, but I'm still paying it, cause the law tells me to."

You see, the law in Texas says a father only has four years to challenge paternity.  If they find out after four years that they are not the father, like Rey Valdez, the law says they are still the parent and still required to pay child support.

State Representative Harold Dutton has tried to pass paternity fraud legislation that would allow a father the right to challenge paternity with a dna test at any time. He told the News 4 Trouble Shooters what's happening now, "is worse than an injustice because now you have the state participating in a fraud."

"We have to fix it so the person paying child support is actually the father, and whatever we have to do to fix that, that's what I think we have to do," said Dutton.  His bill hasn't passed because he says the Attorney Generals office, which collects child support, opposes it. 

The AG's office denies that.  We wanted to ask Attorney General Greg Abbott about paternity fraud, but we only got this statement:

"The Office of the Attorney General is obligated to follow the law.  We must honor court orders that establish paternity and require the payment of child support.  Our staff always encourages men to obtain paternity testing when it is a legal option."

Representative Dutton said he'll file his bill again next year, but he said he needs your help.  You can contact your state representative and senator and ask them to support the change.  Click here to find out who your lawmaker is and how to contact him/her.

Featured Comments
topazeyes - 5/28/2008 11:06 PM
I've seen child support money being misused. It's treated like party money. I over heard this once; " I can't go out with you all tonight, but when I get my child support check next week I'll go." Child support is CHILD SUPPORT. I believe this whole child support system needs to be overhauled. It should be traceable.

ProudDad - 5/21/2008 7:08 AM
Brian Collister has helped bring part of the problem of official abuse of children and men into the arena of public discussion. He and the WOAI news editors deserve all of the kudos and thanks we can give them. The men who spoke out will now be special targets of the A.G. and the courts. They are heroes. I salute these men. Proud Dad

BnaxBnax - 5/15/2008 8:11 PM
The AG office is ruthless when it comes to child support, especially on men. When I adopted my step-son it took 6 months and many trips to the local AG office to get those payments to stop. We just kept sending the payments back to the father. Also found out why they put the costumer service rep behind plexiglass. While we were waiting to be seen by a rep. there was anothter father that came in wanting to get his payments stopped. He had legal custody and the kids lived with him now. He approached the service rep and explained his situation, her response was "just pay your support, you're the father aint ya"! At that point I thought he was going to strangle her, hence the plexiglass.

joicat - 5/15/2008 3:01 AM
TiggerbearsMom-it's true that the child is the one to suffer in these cases, but it's still wrong to force someone to continue paying child support and the real father dosen't. if a man has bonded with the child he may choose to continue to support him. the courts can force them to continue financial support but not emotional support.

TiggerbearsMom - 5/15/2008 1:08 AM
This is hardly "news". This law has been the same for several years. The courts must follow the standard of "what is in the best interest of the child". Now, the reason why paternity can't be contested after a certain deadline is because the child has theoretically already formed a parent-child bond with the alleged father. The child has played with the father, loves the father, grows up with the father, and hopefully respects the father as its parent. Now imagine that the man you have called your father for the past 15 years has demanded a paternity test, discovered that genetically he is not your father, and then he turns his back on you and denies you as his child. How devastating would that be? It's like telling any child... "nevermind, I don't want you anymore". The child is not at fault and did not commit any fraud. The point is that a parent is not just biological material - a parent is a bond of love between a person and a child. The best interest of the child is to continue receiving emotional and financial support so that the child can thrive and become a well-adjusted and productive member of society. This is the same reason why fathers who just done't want to be fathers anymore cannot just terminate their own parental rights - just because you don't want to be a daddy anymore doesn't mean you get to walk away. On a final note... the law I would like to see get changed is the one that requires a husband to be named as the father of a child on the birth certificate (just because they are married) even if both the husband and wife declare that he is not the father.
  This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.