7-mile move costs Social Security millions

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 7/24/2012 10:48 am
Congress continues to debate the nation's budget. At hand is a 10-year plan that would cut more than a trillion dollars.

Still in the line of fire is the Social Security Administration (SSA), the agency that provides benefits to retired and disabled Americans. SSA's commissioner says if they aren't spared the cuts could mean hundreds of lost jobs across the country, closed offices, and potential changes in benefits.

Knowing how tight money is at the federal level one local company is questioning Social Security spending right here in San Antonio. The agency has decided to move one of its offices from an area near Babcock and Loop 410 to a building off San Pedro near Highway 281. The two locations are just seven miles apart.

"The figures we're talking about are astronomical,” Henry Bonilla, former US Representative, told us.

Henry Bonilla is a consultant for MAGI Realty. Since June of 1985 the Social Security Administration has been one of their tenants. But back in February SSA signed a new lease agreement with another company.

"This one stinks. And we're trying to find out what the root of the problem is,” Bonilla said. “If they're some how justified in spending a gazillion dollars, in this political and fiscal environment, well, ok!"

A gazillion dollars is a bit of an exaggeration, but there is a hefty price tag that comes along with the new move.

The new lease agreement says before moving in Social Security will pay to renovate the building off San Pedro. The cost for improvements is $1,749,169.

But rent is also going up. At the old place, found off Woodcock Drive, SSA was paying $500,249 a year for 30,079 square feet. The new location has 32,369 square feet and Social Security will pay $1,062,089 a year for the first ten years.

"Why would somebody be spending this kind of money when, right now at the federal level especially, they're trimming budgets and people are learning to live within their means. So, what's going on here,” Bonilla questioned.

We reached out to the Social Security Administration to ask about the costs associated with their new move. A representative out of Dallas sent us this response: "This office is hiring more judges and more staff to serve the public. The prior location could not accommodate the need for additional space."

Henry Bonilla has asked the US Appropriations Committee to review Social Security's decision to move and the amount of money they spent for that move.

Share
12 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

Diego - 7/25/2012 7:07 PM
0 Votes
Employees have no say so about the move. It is GSA's decision. Wanna gripe about the move contact your congressman!

dltyler - 7/25/2012 3:00 PM
0 Votes
This I guess is a prime reason why I can never seem to get an answer from a human poerson when I phone there office, they are up in the clouds thinking about there new offices. Phhhhhht. This smells like some type of political intervention in a payback for something given now it is time for repayment of that givin. Stinks. A ss disability customer.

Joe Cool - 7/24/2012 10:31 PM
2 Votes
Here is another PRIME example of the so called "Government" WASTING more TAX PAYER money on what appears to be an "upgrade" in facilities with BRAND NEW plush leather furniture and cushy LARGE offices for money grubbing LAZY government employees!!! We all know that these people just want new toys and better furniture which DOES NOTHING but make them LAZIER and take a less vested interest in the very same people they are "supposed" to be helping! Thank you Bonilla for standing up FOR THE PEOPLE, which is why we elected you in the first place, I say KUDDOS to you sir & you will absolutely have my vote in the next election!

Pandora - 7/24/2012 4:48 PM
2 Votes
Let me get this straight, SSA is moving to a new location because additional space is needed for more Judges and staff. And Bonilla is a "consultant" for the very management company, MAGI, that currently has the contract in the building it now occupies. Bonilla is crying "spending" and he is a consultant for the company that is losing the lease contract? Well of course he would complain! And has anyone talked to the staff at SSA? If they did, maybe they would learn about issues such as staff occupying closet space (literally) as office space because there is no more room. Storage of furniture and office materials are kept in the halls due to lack of space. And there is much more. But no, what we hear on the news is how Bonilla feels and he has a vested interest! The building currently occupied by SSA is NOT just occupied by SSA, it is shared by other entities. So moving to a building that will be solely leased by a government entity will provide more safety for the employees, you know, like a Federal Building should be? Issues like location, crime rates, bus routes, etc, are THE legitimate issues that perhaps Bonilla and others should focus on and not just grandstand and shout about a "gazillion" dollars being spent. But I guess when you haven't done your homework, and you don't have facts, you have to use nebulous terms like that.

Boo Spirit - 7/24/2012 11:22 AM
1 Vote
Preexisting has a good point; the SSA isn't going away in my lifetime or my grandchildrens. WHY lease a building?? I saw this story last night on one of WOAI's competitor's and it mentioned that the move would gain the SSA an additional two thousand square feet of space. At double the price per month! As for ex-congressman, he's just fronting for his new employer.

glad1 - 7/24/2012 10:59 AM
0 Votes
Someone is stealing this money in my opinion investigate it now ,we can not afford this ridiculous price , this is coruption at its worst in my opinion , let's hope this is resolved and fixed now!

RRRRR RR - 7/24/2012 9:44 AM
4 Votes
The gov is not following proper procedures. Everyone knows that they are supposed to renovate the old building and then tear it down the following year. This oversight is wrong at so many levels.

Mr Ed - 7/24/2012 9:41 AM
1 Vote
Can someone please explain these terms from our former Congressman, "(t)he figures we're talking about are astronomical” and “If they're somehow justified in spending a gazillion dollars, in this political and fiscal environment, well, ok!" What is astronomical about a million dollars? And what is a gazillion dollars? There must be a conversion chart that changes a million to gazillion. And I'm not talking mathematical either. The Congressman must have some ethereal chart that turns a millions dollars into astronomical and gazillion. Next thing you know the Congressman will claim aliens ate his homework. WOAI if you want to do an investigative article how about the influence peddling of the Congressman, the real estate company and GSA (GSA is responsible for real property). There was probably a few astronomical and gazillion e-mails and hand wringing on the former Congressman's behalf. Or does the former Congressman have a pass card from the press like Mayor Cisneros back in the day who was shielded from negative news stories.

jkachatx - 7/24/2012 7:04 AM
4 Votes
"Mr. Ed" has a great point. Amazing how a former legislator, ne of the partners in MAGI, is making sure to go to the media about how OUTRAGEOUS the spending of the SSA is. Kudos to WOAI.com for playing down the fact that he's a former elected official, asking questions only because his investment company stands to lose a lucrative contract, and highlighting that it's the company he's partner in that is wondering, when they sure made sure to name drop in the article. Great unbiased reporting, guys!

preexisting - 7/23/2012 11:00 PM
5 Votes
One wonders why - just why - does the government rent office space for an agency such as SSA? This is a critical agency, that will be around for some time. Wouldn't it save money to just build a multi-million dollar building to meet the needs of the agency for a decade or two to come? How many other federal agencies are utilizing rental space? I believe Immigration utilizes rental space . . . can we convert some of the Post Office substations that are being closed into office space for federal agencies?
Contact the Trouble Shooters
Have something for the News 4 WOAI Troubleshooters? Call them at 210.476.1070 and leave a message. Or e-mail them at TroubleShooters@woaitv.com.

If you want to report a health issue at a restaurant, call the City of San Antonio at 210-207-8853.

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.