"No-Kill" partnerships costing taxpayers $350,000

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 1/20 7:10 am
SAN ANTONIO - No-Kill by 2012. That was the goal. But 2012 is here and the city is still being forced to euthanize animals.

That said, Animal Care Services says they are one step closer to reaching the city's goal of becoming a No-Kill community. But this one step is going to cost tax payers $350,000; which means ACS will now be paying two local non-profit agencies to take in thousands of our unwanted animals.

The good news? Over the last few years adoption rates for Animal Care Services have increased. But last year 28,401 animals came into ACS and they only had 4,337 adoptions; leaving 18,955 to be put down. The agency knows if they wanted to reach that No-Kill goal, they have to make a big change.

Animal Care Services on the West Side is always full of cats and dogs needing a good home. Unfortunately, for some of the animals the shelter may be their last stop. The number of animals ACS takes in has gone up and so has their euthanization rate. Since 2009 they've increased from about 15,559 to nearly 18,955 in 2011.

ACS works with 77 rescue groups across the country. Combine those rescue groups with the 4,300 local adoptions and you still don't even make a dent in the number of animals ACS takes in every year.

"The challenge in the animal welfare community is there often is a deficit of seed money, seed capital, to get the organizations going,” Joe Angelo, ACS Director, explained. “Because if you rescue an animal, you have to feed it, take care of it, shelter it. And it's always been a barrier. We've always heard if I just had some support, I could rescue more animals."

So that's exactly what ACS did; they took a proposal to city council Thursday that allows them to pay non-profits to help rescue San Antonio animals. It's a plan that will cost $350,000.

"We realize there was a deficit here. And at the end of the day the goal of the city is to increase our live release rate, to get to No-Kill. And the only way to get there is through a partnership,” Angelo told us.

For the next year San Antonio Pets Alive will take 4,000 cats and dogs and get paid $200,000. The San Antonio Humane Society will take in 2,000 animals and bring in $100,000. And an extra $50,000 will be available for smaller rescue groups.

"We think it's a wise investment to the extent that, from our research, it is a viable solution to a challenge that we now face,” Angelo added.

Share
17 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

Dobydog - 1/20/2012 9:05 PM
0 Votes
ignorant people allow their pets to bred at will. I had one ignorant person tell me that they could not nueter their dog because it "was un-natural" as he crossed his legs as if in pain. these ignorant people need to be stopped from having pets and from having kids. by the way, there has been a lot of proof that the way people treat an animal is the way they will treat other people if they think they can get away with it. that explains a lot about the state of SA.

FDNY1983 - 1/20/2012 6:20 PM
0 Votes
Oh and why once again are we as Americans worried about people in OTHER countries when there are thousands of people here in our own backyard that are starving, homeless, and in desperate need. Sure the Horn of Africa and Mexico and many many other countries need help but why do you think everyone hates us- we dictate to everyone else what they should do when we can't even take our own advice nor are we willing to help our own people.

FDNY1983 - 1/20/2012 6:17 PM
0 Votes
Oh- and I'm not math whiz, but if it's costing $350K total, would you not just divide that up among the taxpayers? In a city of millions, that seems like a drop in the bucket...but I don't understand taxes one bit- I just deal with what comes my way because griping about it and getting my panties in a wad isn't going to change a thing and I'm not letting any institution or law hamper my personal happiness in life...

FDNY1983 - 1/20/2012 6:15 PM
1 Vote
There are probably a lot more "less meaningful" things our taxpayer dollars have gone to...such as footing the $100K bill to change maps and street signs just because Cesar Chavez lovers wanted Durango changed...I am all for no kill, and while 350K is an astronomical amount of money, it's better than having strays all over just because people think it's okay to dump an animal on the streets. I don't think that's very fair to the animal just because their owner is irresponsible and takes in a living being without really understanding the commitment that comes with. This is also a much better solution than having to see dead animals strewn all about the streets of San Antonio...I'm not a PETA freak, but I'm also not one think it's okay innocent animals should foot the bill for idiot people who don't spay/neuter their pets and/or get rid of them the moment they realize it's a commitment.

FreeHole - 1/20/2012 3:52 PM
1 Vote
Come onnnnn....you'all are failing to see the solution. Right south of the border there are hundreds of Tarahumara indians (tarah-uh-marah) starving because the brutal drought in Chihuahua state. Implement a policy of no-starve and feed the unwanted dogs to them. Nutrients are nutrients, nobody where they come from. It's a matter of processing the meat and "donate" it to them. It amazes me that there are so many people ripping their clothes off about stupid dogs and cats, when there are LI-TE-RA-LLY thousands of people (mostly kids) dying of hunger in less fortunate countries. Now that's a problem.

Maintenanceman - 1/20/2012 3:18 PM
0 Votes
The only way SA is going to accomplish No-Kill, is for property owners to start shooting strays themselves. There is an extreme feral cat problem where I live. ACS could care less. 25 years ago there were literally no strays in my neighborhood, that is not the case today. NO-KILL really means no capture to look good on paper and get that grant money. Responsible pet owner once again bear the brunt of crappy owners and a crappy city agency. And the wheel goes round and round.

hype28 - 1/20/2012 1:45 PM
0 Votes
upyours808 - if we had watchdog agencies at ACS from the start, we wouldn't be in the mess we are today paying more to kill more animals. Instead, ACS dedicates resources to blocking/impeding public access to open records and taking families to court to keep "dangerous" family pets off the streets and into the landfill. Media are supposed to be watchdog agencies, but they're too concerned with their relationships with the City to ask tough questions or demand truthful answers. I have no problem proposing more oversight to nonprofits. But I also know that these groups (especiall Pets Alive!) already do far more with fewer dollars than the City of San Antonio could ever comprehend. Greater attention to our City government would go a long way, and I doubt ACS is the only department that needs it.

robinsnyder - 1/20/2012 1:39 PM
0 Votes
What is truly unbelievable is that the approval with the San Antonio Humane Society went through even though the city was aware of extremely strong evidence of misuse of funds...and did not initiate and investigation before approving. San Antonio, Texas situation reported to Texas State Attorney General http://www.examiner.com/nonprofit-business-in-san-antonio/san-antonio-texas-situation-reported-to-texas-state-attorney-general Report to the No-Kill Initiative Consortium http://supportsahs.blogspot.com/2012/01/report-to-no-kill-initiative-consortium.html Emails of interest to the San Antonio Area Foundation - City of San Antonio - and others http://supportsahs.blogspot.com/2012/01/emails-of-interest-no-kill-initiative.html ...a post about being reported to the State Attorney General was removed by MySA and also by the SA Express-News Facebook page. I hope that freedom of speech will be allowed by WOAI.

hype28 - 1/20/2012 1:38 PM
3 Votes
And how much do you think killing a hundred dogs and cats, puppies and kittens every day costs? Because that is what has been happening for years at ACS. Personally, I prefer monies that have been used to house and kill dogs and cats instead be used to place those animals into responsible homes. Using the money in this way leverages the existing funds at these nonprofit organizations and makes a true impact on pet overpopulation in San Antonio.

210bro - 1/20/2012 9:59 AM
2 Votes
I wonder how all those chickens are doing after they were rescued from that evil cockfighting ring? Bexar county said they'd be "cared for". Does "cared for" include original or spicy?
Help
Having trouble finding something? Drop us an email and we'll try to assist...

Your Name:

Your Email Address:

Phone: (optional)

Question or Comment:
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.