Well Anonymous I know she had a least one after the disappearance due to her being pregnant when their son "disappered".

In San Antonio, some people think children are disposable, they keep having them just as long as the state keeps supporting them. The mother probably had two or three more children since the disappearance of the baby.

On a previous version of this story, I complained about the lack of background information. So, here we have a more informative story, that is totally devoid of journalistic proficiency, valid information, grammar, and more. Example: "Joshua Davis Jr. disappeared from his New Braunfels home back on February 4, 2011. Davis was only 18-months-old when he disappeared. He would be three-years-old today." Joshua disappeared 2 years ago today at 18 months old. That would make him 3 1/2 years old today, not today his 3rd birthday. So, what are the facts? As for the rest of the story, it stinks badly. There's no evidence of the child being kidnapped, yet no mention of an ongoing investigation by authorities. The family suspects a friend in the disappearance of their son, but..... Either the author of this story really mucked things up and distorted facts, or there's some real funny business going on with this case.

Something is not quite right with this: "Davis' parents say they haven't spoken to that family friend since the night their son went missing." So have the police spoken to this person? Why would you suddenly stop talking to your friend on the day your child goes missing? For what reason would you not contact this person? If my child was missing, I would channel every avenue to find him. Something is suspicious...