Recent vitamin studies cause concern and confusion

(Getty Images)
(Getty Images)
Reported by: Melissa Vega
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 10/12/2011 3:49 pm
SAN ANTONIO -- Recent studies on the effects of vitamins may have many of your asking questions.

"There's so much concern and confusion out there right now, " said Pharmacist Rudy Davila, Owner of Davila's Pharmacy.

A study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, a journal of the American Medical Association, found common daily supplements appear to raise the death rate in older women. Researchers examined data from the Iowa Women's Health study. They tracked about 39,000 women over 19 years. The average age of the women in the study was 62 years old.
 
Brandi Ybarra, who takes a multivitamin every day said she's not concerned about the findings.

"I kinda go back to my mom and my grandma. They all took vitamins, and they seemed to come out okay, " Ybarra told us.
 
Tuesday afternoon, researchers gathered at the UT Heath Science Center San Antonio to discuss the impact of new cancer risk data.

"The impact of this study is profound,"  said Ian M. Thompson Jr,. M.D. director of the Cancer Therapy & Research Center at the UT Health Science Center at San Antonio and one of the study's authors.
 
The results published online in the Journal of the American Medical Association reveal men who took vitamin E were 17-percent more likely to develop prostate cancer.

"The concept that 50-percent of adults over the age of 60 are taking vitamin E and that 23 percent are taking at least the dosage that was used for the study, suggests that many men are impacted by this study, " added Dr. Thompson.
 
Pharmacist Rudy Davila said do not stop taking a vitamin all together.

"If your currently taking vitamin E or  A or D as a supplement, I would not just stop them," Davila suggeted. "I would check with your physician or your pharmacist first."
 
To learn more about the study, CLICK HERE.
 


Share
4 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

spartacus - 10/14/2011 10:44 AM
0 Votes
The women in this study were more likely to die? They had higher death rates? What exactly does that mean? None of us is "likely" to die, we will die. So, how can a person be "more likely" to die?

sugarplums - 10/13/2011 2:30 PM
0 Votes
And tomorrow it will be a different story. I wish they would leave well enough alone. I ignore all this.

Rapscallion - 10/13/2011 2:16 PM
1 Vote
Ian M. Thompson Jr. MD needs to go back to school so he can tell the difference between a valid study and one cobbled together from the recollections of participants. During the period of 18 years (not the 19 cited), the women were interviewed only 3 times. It was left to memory as to what they had eaten and what supplements they had taken. Roughly 15% were smokers, 35% had previously smoked, 45% drank alcohol, and 40% had high blood pressure. All risk factors for developing heart disease, not to mention a cancer risk for smokers. Further, in adjusting for a limited selection of pre-existent risk factors, they actually invalidated any positive results from some of the supplements. Although the abstract doesn't reflect it, the study showed a benefit from taking B-complex, C, D, and E vitamins, and calcium and magnesium. Unfortunately, these types of studies discourage people from learning about supplements and taking control of their health.

wdoug62 - 10/12/2011 5:15 PM
0 Votes
And I suppose pharmacists and primary care physicians are experts on what will cause cancer? I seriously doubt it. Most don't even know about genetic studies as to who is succeptable and who isn't.

68°
High: 90° | Low: 64°
Clear
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.