Download: RSS | Email Alerts | SMS Alerts | Podcasts | Mobile
Hot Topics Quran BuringTravel in StyleBurger RecipesMovie GuideHermine
Right Now: 86° Partly Cloudy

‘Alice in Wonderland’ full of big ideas but ultimately hollow at its core

Reported by: Kiko Martinez
Email: kiko@cinesnob.net
Last Update: 3/05 5:26 pm
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Print Story |

SAN ANTONIO - Director Tim Burton’s visual sensibility is once again at the forefront of another dark spectacle full of big ideas but ultimately hollow at its core. This time it’s “Alice in Wonderland,” a beautifully-realized take on the popular 19th century Lewis Carroll tale, which has been remade numerous times in the past 100 years.

In the newest version, “Alice” takes the best of what Burton does and buries it under an incoherent narrative by animated film screenwriter Linda Woolverton (“Beauty and the Beast,” “The Lion King”). It’s not so much that the magic or overall look has been squandered. The twisted tale of a Mad Hatter, a waist-coated white rabbit, and Cheshire Cat is quite stunning with the characters going through a computer-generated makeover. Burton’s version, however, must overcompensate on imagination when the sluggish story sucks all the adventure out of what could have been an epic reimaging of a beloved classic.

Fresh-face Australian actress Mia Wasikowska (“Defiance”) is entrusted with the role of the title character. In a sort of sequel to any of the preceding films, here Alice is actually returning to the fantasy world most people know from the trippy Disney film of 1951. In this adaptation, Alice is an unconventional 19-year-old who visits a place called Underland after she rejects a suitor who has asked for her hand in marriage.

Bothered by nightmares of her first journey down the rabbit hole (an event she hardly remembers), Alice stumbles yet again into a land where flowers talk, frogs are royal servants, and oversized facial features are signs power. Woolverton’s script even finds room for Carroll’s Jabberwocky, a monstrous character first introduced in his novel “Through the Looking Glass.”

Since her last visit, the vile and bulbous-headed Red Queen (Helena Bonham Carter) has taken over. Alice does her best impersonation of the kids from “The Chronicles of Narnia” to try to stop her and her loyal army. A prophetic scroll shown at the beginning of her second coming reveals Alice to be the one who will put an end to the queen’s reign. Most of the characters, however, think she is the “wrong Alice” and won’t be able to help.

Cast near-perfectly especially with Johnny Depp as the eccentric Mad Hatter, Crispin Glover as the sinister Knave of Hearts, and Alan Rickman and Stephen Fry lending their voices for the hooka-smoking Blue Caterpillar and the hypnotic Cheshire Cat respectively, “Alice” definitely transports us to the world we all new Burton could create. It’s unfortunate, however, that the digital enhancements outweigh a story that is more aware of its dreamlike marvels than before. Because Alice is older, that childlike sense of wonderment is absent. Woolverton (off with her head!) compounds the problem by fashioning a whimsical yet convoluted tale that often becomes dull and gaudy all at once.

Grade: C

Print Story |

Featured Comments
Stabzz - 3/6/2010 10:22 AM
I agree with Ivergott. It is good for little kids to watch and for grandparents to take them to it. If you are a teen and not a grandparent or don't care about story plots, acting and only want eye candy, go watch it. Otherwise skip it. Additionally... Ivergott's review unfortunately misleads the reader to think that this is an "old age classic" however it is NOT! Instead it is a SEQUEL to an "old age classic" to which I truly hope is never considered a classic.

lvergott - 3/6/2010 7:47 AM
Having viewed the movie in IMAX 3D I believe the review to be incorrect on many levels. The writer neglects to advise the public of the effects, which are computer animated and lend and assist to this movie the unmistakeable uniqueness that which is Tim Burton and Johnny Depp. The experience of watching this old age classic with the added creations of the 3D elements a true event to behold. As a 50 year old woman I felt I truly could not be entertained by this production and erred greatly, I recommend the movie highly to those with grandchildren and children alike and feel the money spent was worth every penny spent.

Kenoscope - 3/5/2010 11:29 PM
I have found, on average, that if a paid professional critic hates something, i will most likely find enjoyment within it. And when they love something, not to waste my money on it. This after fifty eight years of life.

Stabzz - 3/5/2010 9:47 PM
Saw it with a bunch of teenage girls tonight. The movie was terrible. One of the worst I have seen in a long time. The girls agreed that the acting was bad and storyline was bland and VERY predictable. The only redeeming quality was the CGI. We went to try and catch it in IMAX and I am glad it was sold out so I didn't waste the extra money for that version. Wish I could get 1.5hrs and $20 of my life back...

Related Headlines




  This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.