Download: RSS | Email Alerts | SMS Alerts | Podcasts | Mobile
Hot Topics H1N1Spot CrimeHigh-water rescueFood 4 SAMovie Guide
Right Now: 56° Mostly Cloudy

“2012” both enormous and awful

Reported by: Kiko Martinez
Email: kiko@cinesnob.net
Last Update: 11/14 8:18 am
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
John Cusack saves his daughter from Doomsday in "2012."
John Cusack saves his daughter from Doomsday in "2012."

While the new apocalyptic thriller by director/writer Roland Emmerich (“The Day After Tomorrow”) might look like a 10.5 on the Richter scale based solely from its highly-intense, CGI-heavy previews, the event itself is more comparable to the seismic energy of a lopsided shopping cart wobbling down a grocery store aisle.

It shouldn’t be too surprising, however, if you’re familiar with Emmerich’s work. Giving audiences things that are both enormous and awful isn’t a new idea for him. From 1998’s larger-than-life lizard remake “Godzilla” to last year’s unfortunate prehistoric epic “10,000 B.C.,” it’s fairly safe to say Emmerich isn’t the type of filmmaker anyone would consider a minimalist when it comes to the technical aspects of his movies.

While it wasn’t such a problem with the cheese-fest that was “Independence Day” in 1996 (who wasn’t cheering for Will Smith to annihilate some hostile aliens?), there is something about “2012” that can’t be fixed no matter how many tsunamis are unleashed or buildings obliterated.

Forget the fact that a comprehensible narrative is missing and that the dialogue is worthy of massive eye-rolling. You might even overlook some of the countless cornball scenes throughout the film’s 158-minute runtime. What mainstream moviegoer is walking into this for character development anyway? The main problem with “2012” is that none of it is startling anymore. Emmerich does little to take the disaster movie to the next level other than to shell out more cash for extra special effects that ultimately feel worn.

In the film, John Cusack (“1408”) plays Curtis Jackson, a limo driver and small-time author who inexplicably finds out the world is coming to an end. Curtis isn’t the only one that knows this secret. The government, with the help of geologist Adrian Helmsley (Chiwetel Ejiofor), is aware of cataclysmic events that will happen. Judgment Day has been prophesied with the end of the Mayan calendar coming on Dec. 21, 2012. Now, with scientific evidence supporting this theory, administrations around the world have prepared for the worst by building “ships” to save as many people as possible before the earth begins to implode on itself.

As Adrian battles dishonesty within the White House, Curtis’ thoughts are with his family who – along with a majority of the population – have no idea what is about to happen. It’s at this point in the big-budget adventure where the destruction begins and never lets up. While the first rescue mission is actually quite fun (basically, it’s what you see in one of the movie trailers), Emmerich chucks in just about every disaster movie cliché in the book. It’s like getting punched repeatedly in the face. The first few blows are going to sting the most, but after 18 rounds, everything feels numb.

Emmerich tries to balance out the action by raising moral questions about the significance of saving certain people and things from being destroyed, but it all comes in a distance second to what most people are probably looking for – death and mayhem. It’s all there in “2012” for the less demanding moviegoers. For everyone else, the world doesn’t end soon enough.

Grade: D+

Featured Comments
Cheese - 11/15/2009 8:19 PM
If your sole purpose of going to "2012" is to criticize every aspect of the movie, then save your $9.50. If you're going to be entertained, eat popcorn and to see the best possible CGI, then I highly recommend this movie. It was seat of the pants, arm chair gripping when the earth starts to implode on itself. A great date night movie with my wife. It's long (over 2.5 hour) so don't hydrate if you are like myself and don't like to get up during the movie. Good fun!

Neisie000 - 11/15/2009 7:10 PM
GREAT MOVIE!!! HAD ME AT THE EDGE OF MY SEAT THE WHOLE TIME!!! I RECOMMNED YOU WATCH & I AM THE TYPE WHO BEGS AND PLEADS NOT TO GO TO THE MOVIES

SpursFan4Life - 11/14/2009 2:13 PM
Thanks for saving me a trip to the theater. I had seen John Cusack give an interview on Rachel Ray yesterday and by what he described the movie did sound boring. He attempted to explain it as it was Noah Ark but for the human kind. And to me that just was not interesting. This director did make the Day After Tomorrow seem interesting but to tackle this "end of the world" topic, yeah I have to agree judging by the movie trailers it is not one to rush to see. At least Hollywood isn't getting any of my money on this one!

yourwrong - 11/14/2009 9:35 AM
I am not relly sure where I stand when it comes to some of the things that are being said about 2012. All I am saying is if it or something similar is going to happen I dont want to know the date I am going to die. If a doctor gives me six months to live I dont want to know I would rather just not wake up. The whole time before you die you will be to scared of when that time comes and you would be miserable. I am not going to see the movie.



  This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.