Collister Investigates

Appeals court tweaks HOA ruling

Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 12/19/2011 9:12 pm
A homeowner’s fight against his HOA goes another round in court. This time both sides are claiming victory.

Hidden Forrest homeowner Kent Hern beat his HOA and it's attorney in 2010 when they tried to take his house for past dues even though he tried to later pay up.

But now an appeals court has changed the ruling, saying Hern is not entitled to have the HOA pay his legal bills.

“The homeowners association didn't do anything wrong and that it's not responsible to Mr. Hern for any damages or attorneys fees”, said HOA attorney Tom Newton.

But Newton also was denied his legal fees in the appeal. He asked the court to overturn a Bexar county juries ruling saying he was not entitled to $25,000 for his legal work. Instead he only gets about $800 for his time on the case.

“In the end the court watered down my clients victory a little bit but rather than us winning thirty five to nothing, it was more like twenty one nothing,” said Hern’s attorney Peter Kilpatrick.

The court said Hern was not entitled to have his attorneys fees paid because he did not prove mental anguish. Which means if you take you HOA to court, you're paying for it unless you can prove the case caused you personal harm.

Share
18 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of News 4 WOAI (WOAI.com)

Girau - 2/3/2012 8:36 PM
0 Votes
HOA collects your money, no let me correct myself. The HOA robs the homeowners money every year for maintanence that never happen to the community. The HOA in San Antonio is a joke and all they do is collect money and sit on their butts and when they don't receive their dues they foreclose on a property. My parents owns a house in New York and they pay dues to the HOA but at least they are cutting the grass, repairing the driveway if needed and fixing the roofs of the house if needed.

Kickedtothecub - 12/22/2011 5:18 PM
0 Votes
teddielavllee - As much as I despise lawyers, I wish those Brentwood Commons HOA members would take their board to court over such a bone-head action. That and enough publicity to make other HOA's think twice before similar stunts.

teddielavallee - 12/22/2011 4:37 PM
0 Votes
Power goes to the HOA board members' heads to the point that they do NOT use any judgement and waste other HOA members money! Case in point. Brentwood Commons HOA just spent around 6,000.00 suing a resident for installing a satellite dish even though federal law clearly states (since 1996) that a townhome owner has every right to install a satellite dish and does not even have to ask for HOA permission. Furthermore, a qualified manager would have known about this law. However, the manager is the former live in boyfriend of a former board member. Adding insult to injury. The board has now imposed a 30.00 monthly fee increase. I could go on and on about their poor "accounting", "budgeting", and other wasteful practices.

teddielavallee - 12/22/2011 4:24 PM
0 Votes
This is a QUESTION---not a comment. Can someone define what the appeals court means by "PERSONAL HARM"!

Dobydog - 12/21/2011 8:01 AM
1 Vote
I owned a house in an HOA once. the lesson I learned was that I will never ever own or even rent another home in an HOA anywhere. the leaders were nothing more than dictators. I had a neighbor pull out a joint fence which was owned by both of us and left it down over night until they cam back the next day to put up her new fence. During the rest of that day, my 2 dogs had open access to her yard with her open gate onto a busy street. her dog also had free access to my yard and he did come and leave a "gift" on my patio. when I finally got a hold of the HOA president that night (no one else was available) he held at me for "bothering" him. No one in the subdivision gastopo even contacted me to tell me the fence was being removed let alone ask me if I agreed to it. that fence belonged as much to me as it did to her so by giving her permission to take out the fence were they not a party to theft of propery?

Kickedtothecub - 12/20/2011 7:32 PM
1 Vote
trutex- Just one problem with the referendum idea; because h.o.a.'s are mainly for the benefit of little dictators and lawyers, the percentage of homeowners needed to dissolve most is set ridiculously high. I know of one such home owners association that demands 85 percent of homeowner to agree to dissolution. In todays climate, you couldn't get 85 percent of most homeowners to agree that chocolate ice-cream is tasty. Perhaps Shakespeare was right, "First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."

trutex - 12/20/2011 12:12 PM
2 Votes
Every HOA regulation that is not dictated by city codes should have to be put to a vote by all those whose house is covered. A referendum would also be a good idea so that if enough votes can be obtained then a particular HOA reg could be put to a vote for repeal or modification. When it comes to HOAs direct democracy is desirable. HOAs are supposed to be for the benefit of the homeowners not the other way around; or for the benefit of City Govt for that matter.

JoNoes - 12/20/2011 12:04 PM
0 Votes
Valuable lesson indeed for both sides. Mr Hern didn't get his legal bills to be paid but, neither did HOA Newton. But, $25K for legal work is ridiculous and the jurors saw it as such and that's why he only gets $800. Good luck next time representing the blood sucking HOA's!

Kickedtothecub - 12/20/2011 10:34 AM
1 Vote
Don't get me started about home owners associations; home owners a$$es as I usually refer to them. Those posters who think they're a good idea that got out of hand are sticking their heads in the sand. When a person buys a house in a subdivision that requires h.o.a. membership, they are signing away ALL their rights to how their house and yard will look. H.o.a.'s are an invention of greedy lawyers (is that redundant?) and cater to dictatorial little tyrants who love to stick their nose in everyones business. Folks, the next time you're thinking about buying a house in an h.o.a. subdivision, stop a realize that that house is basically holding you ransom to the whims of a group of petty dictators. We have city zoning codes, why in the world to we need h.o.s.? Oh yeah, the Texas Lege,dominated by lawyers, decide to funnel more money to them and they associates. A very sad situation.

jimmyz - 12/20/2011 9:55 AM
0 Votes
My HOA president isn't "white people".
Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.